I have to admit I was quite surprised to learn that the image of a "normal" looking model was the brain child of Glamour Magazine. I also confess I don't read the pub much as it didn't seem to reflect where I was in life (a 40+ mother who hasn't seen a single digit size since before my daughter was born). But I'll have to give them a second chance if they keep their word and listen to the hundreds of women writing in to say how much they appreciate their "reality" check.
It all started last week when the September issue of Glamour hit newstands. Buried on page 194 the image at left and an article about women who exuded body confidence. Featured was 20-year-old Lizzie Miller, a "plus-size" model who is in fact the "average" size of women in America, wearing a size 12-14. Her tasteful, but completely unretouched photo shows Lizzie seated in the buff, tummy roll and all. The confidence she exuded was contagious. And women across the country began to write into Glamour telling them how grateful they were to finally see a model who actually looked more like they do. The buzz was enough to attract the attention of NBC's Matt Lauer who featured LIzzie and the editor of Glamour in a segment last week. If you missed it, catch it here.
What do you think about Glamour's decision to feature a normal looking model? Do you think they will continue to do so, or was this just a publicity stunt?
Join & Comment